Tuesday, December 11, 2007
24
I ended up catching a nasty cold yesterday, so I am all bundled up and feeling miserable. Additionally, I have a Greek final tomorrow and that means I won't get as much sleep tonight as I should. But that's okay! Once the Final is over, I will be thrilled! The only thing I got left is to write a petty paper that is due Friday, which is highly subjective to what I want to write about (and I will be given an A for it by merely turning it in!), so I'm not concerned about that.
I want to thank all my family and friends for calling me today and telling me happy birthday. I felt very loved.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Friday, November 23, 2007
The Mist

Sunday, November 18, 2007
"Are you the one they call Beowulf?"
Wednesday, November 07, 2007
Irreducible Complexity

Irreducible Complexity? This is a term created by Dr. Michael Behe, biochemist at LeHigh University, from which the scientific community has never been the same sense. Although Behe is (still?) a theistic evolutionist, his book is a powerful witness to devastating flaws in evolution (Go CREATION!). At times the book is hard to understand amongst the scientific mumbo-jumbo, but Behe does a good job at summarizing it in a way that lay people can understand. So what is irreducible complexity? It basically refers to those biological systems, which are in their current observed state, that could not exist without ALL of its current functioning parts.
The most easiest, rudimentary example is a mouse trap. The mouse trap consists of only a handful of parts (i.e., spring, board, etc.). If any of these parts are removed, the mouse trap fails. It can no longer function. What can we derive from this observation? If the mousetrap could not be deconstructed from its current state, then it would be impossible for evolution to have evolved a mouse trap.
This applies to countless biological systems, two of which I will mention. First, there is blood clotting (the science is too complicated here, so suffice to say I will only briefly mention it). The nature of blood clotting is irreducibly complex. If any of its functions were gone, the clotting could not happen. Result? A single cut that is deep enough to draw blood would never stop bleeding until the being was dead. Thus any animal that was possibly "evolving" would never survive in the end, because a single cut would wipe out the species existence. Secondly, there is the cell. The cell comprises (as far as I know) all of biological systems. If something so basic could not have possibly evolved, how could any other system have evolved? Could a cell live without a ribosome? No! A lysosome? No! Therefore, how could it have possibly evolved if it could never survive without all of its parts working together? And that's the point...
Fascinating book. I highly recommend it!
Sunday, November 04, 2007
Thursday, November 01, 2007
SWISH: Star Wars Is So Horrible

Wednesday, October 24, 2007
The New Member

Tuesday, October 09, 2007
a moment of "aaahhh"

Let us take a moment and ponder the magnificent wonder, the majestic splendor, and the brilliant nature of this exceptionally exquisite concoction of nature, known to any enlightened individual as the divinely essential nectar of holistic goodness; captivating the imagination of countless souls with a tenacious pomp unparalleled in the cosmos, its fruition laid bare in the warmth of our bodies, blossoming our eyes with lovely adoration towards every spector which elevates its existence to its rightful throne of supremacy!
Yes, coffee is amazing.
Yes, I am enjoying my cup right now.
got coffee?
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Currently, I have my eye on this particular book. I am rather interested in exorcism, demons, and spiritual warfare. This book writes about the Early Church and how they dealt with such issues in the first few centuries. I believe it will be an interesting and highly educational read (when I have the money to buy it and the time to read it, of course). It tends to be a neglected subject in the Church today (especially the Protestant church), which is sad. I hope to become more aware of what went on with my brothers and sisters in the past over this issue, as well as how I can apply it today.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
BIG Budget!
Listen up, everybody: revolve your schedules around Thursday nights at 9 o'clock.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!! ("That's what she said")
Sunday, September 23, 2007
Zero

Aaaah, isn't he cute? This here is my iguana, Zero. He is about 3 to 4 months old and is highly active. He's incredibly fast and quite strong for a little guy.
Diet: Mostly collard greens, mustard greens, and turnip greens. Occassionally a banana, butternut squash, or apples.
Enclosure: 30 gallon tank. I use a flood lamp to heat up one side to mid 90's and a UVB lamp for his "sun-radiation" requirements. :)
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
Employee of the Month!
What can I say? I'm honored. :)
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Confessor...finished
Everyone get ready for the greatest series ever written to commence its climactic end!
11-13-07
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Monday, September 17, 2007
Jibber-Jabber
First off, USC won. The huskers were bleeding red for real this time.
Secondly, I practically laughed when I heard the announcer mention UCLA's pathetic defeat.
Third, I am finally getting over being sick. I had too much school and work for me to miss, so I had to push it through and try and make the round-a-bout way of recovering: coughing and sneezing profusely during class and work.
Fourth, my iguana is doing well. We updated his aquarium because the old one was simply way too small. Plus I got the correct calcium supplement WITHOUT phosporous. I love iguanas!
And lastly, me and my wife are all around doing well. This week I don't have a lot of hours at work, so I will be able to finally catch up in some of my reading. My wife is studying diligently (and stressfully) for her upcoming qualification exam. Please send out a prayer for her success on it. It will be NEXT wednesday, the 25th.
One more thing, Rebecca and I are going to Porterville on Saturday the 29th to celebrate my dad's 49th birthday! Next year will have to be special because he will be the big 5-0!
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
A moment
Although a day late, I would ask that anyone who reads this post to take a moment of silence for 60 seconds in rememberance of those lives taken 6 years ago...
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Here-Here!
Oh and isn't it great to have Rob Fukuzaki's autograph? I feel better about myself already! :)
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Monday, September 03, 2007
THE CURSED HEAT!
This just reminds me my need of moving somewhere far north (Lord willing). Sorry for all the negativity, but it was necessary. Bring on 60 degree weather!!! WOO-HOO!
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Monday, August 27, 2007
words of the "wise"
~Joey Tribbiani
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
The grit of Grad school
That's right, if I want to get an A in a class, I need AT LEAST a 94%. Now I don't quite know how exactly some of these teachers will grade, but it is possible that the days of getting a lot of A's have now passed. ..........WHO CARES! I'm blessed to have the opportunity to go to school. The Lord has blessed me indeed.
(I almost forgot...Toby...wear some deoderant and take a shower every once and awhile. I can smell you from over here dude)
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Monday, August 20, 2007
Banquet...FREE food!!
I'm definitely liking this idea of a cruise for next summer by the Lewsadder's. I can't guarantee our presence at this point, but we are really excited about possibly going on a cruise with family!
To all my friends and family: my wife and I give our love. Peace
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
Living it up in the Stock room
Speaking of a new schedule, I will be starting Grad school next Wednesday at Talbot School of Theology. I am very excited and can't wait to learn new material. Plus, the school is rather "commuter-friendly". I will be taking 11 units (9 is full-time in grad school) and those classes reside on ONLY Monday and Wednesday. However, I do have another class on Saturday, but that is only 5 Saturdays out of the semester. Basically, a student can set up their schedule to only have to go to class a couple times out of the week! Most of their classes are once a week, which makes it wonderful for me! That will help me save on the gas money. Cha-CHING!
My classes are Hermeneutics and Bible Study Methodology, Survey of Genesis-Malachi, Theology I:Revelation and the Nature of God, and (hopefully if I can crash the course) Greek I.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
His Dark Materials: The Golden Compass vol. 1
In either case, it was a fantastic story. I am eager to read the other two. I must say, perhaps to the dismay of some, that Pullman's book is far greater than the Harry Potter series. I stopped a fifth of the way through The Goblet of Fire last summer and have not picked it up since. The story isn't bad or anything like that, its just the writing tends to not grip me. I definitely feel the Harry Potter series are books for children while Pullman's book are filled with elements that drag me out of the typical child-like features of young adult genres. Bottom line, I don't feel any obligation to push myself through a series that never gripped me in the first place. As for Pullman's trilogy, my interest is peaked and I desire more armored bears!!!
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Thursday, May 31, 2007
The honor student graduates...
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Movie titles to look forward to
1) National Treasure: Book of Secrets
The first movie absolutely rocked. It was one of those films that was "pure fun" and they are always a real treat to watch. The second movie has all the characters as in the first (which is great considering most sequels exclude the "romantic other" because "things didn't work out") and is about the 18 pages missing in John Wilkes Booth diary. Sounds amazing.
Release date: December 21st, 2007
2) The Dark Knight
This is the sequel to Batman Begins and is the second installment out off three. Heath Ledger will be playing the Joker and I believe he will do quite well with his enormous smile. The first movie blew my mind away and I can't see why the second would fail to do the same. Sadly, we've got a year to wait.
Release date: July 18th, 2008
3) Transformers
The trailer looked phenomenal. The graphics alone are worthy of praise. The storyline seems mediocre, but definitely fits the genre. I can't wait to see it!
Release date: July 4th, 2007
4) Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix:
I've loved the previous four movies and each one gets better and better. I don't think I need to say much about it, so I will leave it at that.
Release date: July 11th, 2007.
5) Alien Versus Predator 2
The movie is a supreme example of fan based. The first one was great, but was rather disappointing due to its extremely short length. Nonetheless, being a fan I look forward to seeing it in December!
Release date: December 25th, 2007.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Work
I am currently reading a book that is a critique on modern psychology. It is rather interesting, and I might share some of my insights on the book when I am finished.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Sunday, May 13, 2007
Graduation!
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Williams-Sonoma
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
GIANT SQUID!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/12/061222-giant-squid.html
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Monday, April 30, 2007
Exiting exam - PASSED
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Exiting Exam - COMPLETED
But I have really good news. I HAVE THE INTERNET BABY! While typing this blog at this very moment, I am using my high speed internet at home. Freedom at last!
And as for the ETS meeting, I thoroughly enjoyed it. I thoroughly enjoyed the paper given on Apostolic usage of Old Testament prophecies and the paper on the hypostatic union of Christ (I know, just a bunch of "theo-babble", but it comes with the territory). All in all, I look forward to the next one.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
ETS Seminar
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Thursday, April 12, 2007
FTS
I will be applying for a Masters of Theology in Biblical Studies and Theological Format.
And, its not as expensive as I thought, only $288 dollars per unit!
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Monday, April 02, 2007
The "Great Tragedy" of 2007
His final words were simply, "The sky isn't so blue anymore."
May this year be marked in the annals of Dark Tragedies, hopefully forgetten in the shades of time...
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Another Christian teacher fired...
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2007/0327or-teacher.asp
To get the secular paper, a link is listed at the bottom of the article from the The Oregonian.
By sticking to the "goal" of the Oregan public school system of "any genuinely scientific evidence for or against any explanation of life may be taught", Mr. Helpinstine merely gave articles that showed how bias affected science. He used two articles from a Creationist author BUT removed anything speaking about God or the Bible in the article. As such, he never taught Creationism, but was setting out to show how some modern science can be molded by bias rather than pure scientific observation. He was also bashed for showing slideshows that shows how Nazi's and eugenics were linked to evolution (which there is a strong connection between the two). Science is not perfect because man is behind the interpretation. The Nazi's were huge advocates of evolution. ONe doesn't have to look far as to why when they know the actual WHOLE title of Darwin's book, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life." Did Darwin say "favoured" races? Evolution is definitely a racist theory.
In any case, it is a tragedy and an outrage that this teacher was fired as a result of all of this. There are vastly MORE FACTS AND EVIDENCES on the process of human history and origins than just the THEORY of evolution presented in school textbooks. There are brilliant works. Anyone hear of Biochemist Michael Behe's book Darwin's Black Box? It's awesome!
Bottomline:
Science is the pursuit of truth. Brilliant Christian SCIENTISTS (believe it or not) have actual SCIENTIFIC reasons for claiming Creationism over evolution. How about people be more "open-minded" towards the facts and theories presented by the other side???????
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
A forum for debate and dialogue
First, the question is what would you rather choose, justice or charity?
My thesis was:
"ALL virtues are bound together as a systematic whole, making their function and existence dependent on their interaction with one another."
Some support:
The idea of "social justice" could simply not exist without the fusing of justice and charity. This does not mean that law or the justice system per se could not exist. The discussion is dealing with "virtues" which manifest themselves in different forms (i.e., justice and charity). Justice as law enforcement could exist, but by that definition alone it is nothing more than "control" or "stability" of society. That is hardly a system of justice people would want to exist. Thus what we understand to be justice would not exist without charity. Similarly, charity suffers if our concept of justice is not adequately dealing with the problems of society.
My conclusion:
"It is impossible to choose one particular virtue over another as it would negate whichever virtue remains."
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Justice vs. Charity
Furthermore, I believe in the correspondence theory of epistemology that says what we can know about truth has to relate (in some form or another) to reality. This begs the question of whether a world without justice could exist (or charity for that matter)? A world without justice is one I can only imagine. Every group of people has some form of justice, even if it is not sophisticated or placed in written form. Without Justice, every society would experience total anarchy, destruction, and violence. Similarly, without charity, poverty would overrun our streets, deaths would increase (no blood drives, no charities for discovering new diseases), and a vast amount of other atrocities would occur.
Under my comprehension of the essence and purpose of virtues, I believe the questions collapses within itself.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Tolerance continued...
[Before I say anything else I must make one thing clear. Although I am a Christian, this doesn’t deny the fact that I am human and a sinner. I continually need the grace of the Lord Jesus and His mercy and forgiveness. I do not claim to be, in any shape or form, a perfect person. Far from it, I am always discovering more and more flaws about myself. As a result, I do not claim what I do watch is actually what I SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be watching. Some movies, I am sure, as a Christian God would not want me to watch. Some movies that I now think are acceptable, I could find out later in life that God disapproves of them. It is possible that a reader could point out a movie that might genuinely conflict with what I claim and I apologize in advance.]
I believe it is appropriate to begin with my "faith principles" as I have called them. The two principles are the condemnation of the sins of violence and homosexuality. A Christian is not to commit violence unless on the grounds of self-defense or for an act that produces a greater good (such as joining the Army in WWII to stop the extermination of the Jews). Homosexuality, most specifically the BEHAVIOR of homosexuality, is also a sin that God condemns. Under no circumstance is homosexuality a behavior that finds pleasure in God’s eyes nor is can it ever be seen as an “okay” behavior.
Following these two ideas, a Christian is not to SUPPORT, ENCOURAGE, nor PARTICIPATE in such acts. The former two are the particular actions that are under examination.
When I watch the movie The Ring, am I “supporting” or “encouraging” the actions of violence? This question demands almost exclusively on the nature of the movie. The "nature" of the movie Brokeback Mountain and the "nature" of the movie The Ring are vastly different. But before I analyze this thought, it is important to understand the relationship between the events of a movie and the reviewer watching the events. To state a person is supporting violence by watching a violent movie, as a proposition is a hard position to defend. This type of logic leads someone to supporting Adolph Hitler’s extermination of the Jews just because they watch Schindler’s List. Or because someone watches Black Hawk Down, they are supporters of Clinton’s political action in sending the Rangers into combat. This is obviously a false notion. Without a doubt, people watch movies to be entertained, but based on the “nature” of the movie, the issue of supporting the contents immediately come under scrutiny. This brings us back to the original statement that Brokeback Mountain and The Ring have two different “natures”. Brokeback Mountain is “advocating” a particular action I believe to be sin, while The Ring is telling a story for the sake of terrorizing the audience. I know this is up to debate, but I believe that the “nature” of Brokeback Mountain is to tell a story FOR THE SAKE of supporting the act of homosexuality. I do not believe the motive of the director and writer was merely to tell a story for the sake of telling a story. Schindler’s List was telling a story for the sake of revealing the horrors of the holocaust. The Ring was telling a story for the sake of scaring the audience, and Brokeback Mountain was telling a story for the sake of supporting homosexual behavior. If The Ring was made for the purpose of advocating the acceptability of violence, then I would have a different opinion about The Ring. Considering The Ring does not contain that “nature”, I do not believe I am being unfair by watching The Ring, while not watching Brokeback Mountain. Therefore, I am not being close-minded by not watching Brokeback Mountain, as I am not being unfair in how I treat it and other movies for having strong reasons for refraining from watching it (this does not include my reason that I find it extremely disgusting and that alone would repel me from the movie. Nor does it include how I do not find the story line interesting enough to spend two hours watching it).
I am showing tolerance by respecting the reasons why Kelly watched the movie. I am being open-minded to why people made the movie (they want homosexual behavior to be accepted) although I disagree and have my own reasons that justify my belief and justify why I chose not to watch that particular movie.
Post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Sunday, March 11, 2007
America's "godly" virtue
“A sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or conflicting with ones own. Or B) the act of allowing something.”
Basically, tolerance means one must allow the other belief to exist. However, I didn’t notice it saying a person must conform to the belief. The reader might be asking why I mentioned this. Let me explain.
Over the past couple of years I have encountered people who have declared other persons not open-minded (a.k.a, tolerant) for not adhering to what they believe. Here are some examples:
The first incident I recall so clearly was when I was at Cyrus’ house and he had some of his friends over for hanging out. I was in Cyrus’ room playing Halo, and his friend, Kelly, was on the bed behind us reading a magazine. For reasons I do not recall she mentioned how she had recently watched the movie “Brokeback Mountain.” She then proceeded to mention how there were some people who didn’t want to watch it with her because they “were not as open-minded” as her. A little alarm went off in my head at my awareness of the logical fallacy she just made. I called her on it, “So what you are saying is considering they didn’t see the movie, they are being closed minded as a result? And the fact that you went and saw the movie means you are open-minded?” Her obvious answer was “yes”. *Sigh*
I didn’t press the issue any further. Halo was on my mind, Cyrus needed to get whipped, and I honestly didn’t care to debate. I ask myself now, what was wrong with that picture? What logical fallacy did Kelly commit? According to the implications Kelly made by locking out certain persons as close-minded for not watching the film, she herself became “closed-minded” (or intolerant).
To clarify, lets say person A went to go do action X while person B did not do action X. Person A declares that all who do not do X is close-minded. Person B simply believes that X is not desirable and does not do X accordingly. Person B believes A has a right to do X, but personally will not do X. Therefore, Person A is close-minded for not tolerating Person B’s reasons for not doing X.
Bottom line, Kelly’s logic is a trap set up for all who do not support her view. Those who won’t actually watch the film, although they may have their reasons, are not tolerated for their reasons and are labeled close-minded. In the end, it’s a label to help make Kelly feel good about her own belief, when she is actually close-minded for not respecting others. But this isn’t the only case I’ve encountered. An almost EXACT scenario happened with my friend Ian over the same movie. Plus, on the show Friends, Mrs. Geller told Ross and Rachel that some of their family were not as “open-minded” with the idea of them having a child out of wedlock. This translates into “Because our other family do not like people having children out of wedlock, they are close-minded for not agreeing and conforming to our view that it is okay.”
I must emphasize that all of this does not mean that people can’t have views that says others are completely wrong. The person who claims that (as do I with many of my convictions and principles in accordance with my Christian Faith) would be intolerant if they did not respect the other’s opinions by granting them the right to have such opinions. Stating a view that claims all others are wrong is a “view” nonetheless. If someone were to tell me that Hell did not exist, I would quickly respond with “you’re wrong.” But, the person has a right to believe such things. Likewise, people are welcome to say I’m wrong, ignorant, or even foolish for what I believe.
But the exclusive nature of my Faith and convictions are my right to cherish and believe. So don’t be close-minded, be open-minded by tolerating my views as well as others.
Let’s not succumb to a new definition of tolerance/open-mindedness:
The necessity to AGREE and CONFORM to another persons belief regardless of ones own reasons for believing differently, or B) People with beliefs of an exclusive nature sacrificing their reasons/beliefs for the person(s) demanding an all inclusive belief system.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
fear factor
In V for Vendetta, “real” butter was outlawed because it was unhealthy. Solution? Power was passed on to the government. Now California is facing having the government tell people how to raise their children. Anyone recall a woman crying out to have a law passed for people to not spank their children? Psychologists are afraid that spanking will “damage the psyche” of the child. WHAT?!
Fear gives power to the hungry. Is the “global warming” issue really a “moral” issue, as Al Gore put it? First off, any “smart” politician recognizes the last presidential election was won over “moral” issues. Gore recognizes this and labels global warming a “moral” issue. Tell me, Mr. Gore, what is really a moral issue here: Tens of thousands of children dying every year due to starvation, or the ONE “INTERPRETATION” you choose to believe that equates to “global warming”?
Global warming is an issue of power, not morality. The person who gets elected for his agenda to “cure” supposed “global warming” will be placing massive power in his hands. Industries will have to comply with “global” friendly regulations and civilians will eventually have to get rid of their cars after 50,000 miles. Every company, building going under construction, and national park will have to yield to the laws being passed by the “Global Warming Committee” (or whatever they might call themselves). Misleading facts have been so implanted in our minds, we actually succumb to thinking global warming is a real threat (notice there are TWO sides to the debate for reasons we usually ignore), thus out of fear we give up some of our freedom for “security”. Security always comes at a price: freedom.
The government needs to stay out of affairs that are none of their business. But it is everyday people like us who are ultimately responsible for the power governments get. Governments are the ones to be afraid of the people, hence why they should serve them.
There is talk in Massachusetts saying that kids should be brought into school at age three to determine (through some psychological analysis) of whether they should be put on Ritalin! Plus there is talk about how kids should be taught in school how homosexuality is okay and that they should accept it. DAMN ANY GOVERNMENT WHO DARES TO EXERCISE SUCH TYRANNICAL LEGISLATION!!! I will raise my child in the way I believe is right, not by some “policy”. I can’t stand by and watch some of these things happen any more. I will do my part as best I can.
My rant and ravings sounds very much like our Founding Fathers who fought against "Tyranny". But we seem to be blind to it in America because it is slowly drifting in our midst, gently turning our heads in the other direction. I can't believe how blind I've been to it.
In the words of V when telling the public who was responsible for the tyranny of the government................“You only have to look in the mirror”.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Saturday, March 03, 2007
The all-time famous quote from "V for Vendetta"
who are you?
"This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is it vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished, as the once vital voice of the verisimilitude now venerates what they once vilified. However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation, stands vivified, and has vowed to vangquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition.
The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose vis-a-vis an introduction, and so it is my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V."
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Thursday, March 01, 2007
tightening loose bolts
I love Toby. He is a great cousin and a man I truly admire! Nothing will change that....not even my pathetic jokes.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Monday, February 26, 2007
A Critique of Toby's Fable, "Ryamiah"
Fact or Fiction?
Claim #1 Ryan and Jeremiah are dating:
Toby’s only support that he draws from this statement is the picture he posted in the previous post. The person with common sense can easily observe that the picture of Ryan’s face was imposed on the bride standing next to me. An imaginative leap for a desperate soul: FICTION
Claim #2 Jeremiah and Ryan are lovers
This claim, I must admit, can be held plausible since no solid evidence can be put forth at the present time. However, I can safely undermine this as a substantial accusation by investigating its real source. Anyone who wants to get to the heart of the matter has only to ask Toby’s wife of his captivation with all things relating to same gender relations and I promise it will prove to be most fruitful for my case. It makes one wonder if this obnoxious obsession has anything to do with jealousy spawned from his very own tale of fantasy. An imaginative leap for a pathetic prosecutor: FICTION
Claim #3 Changing my major to Fashion
Sharing my love for spandex and pokadots with the world, however true this may be, has NEVER detoured me from my current major. Any investigator has only to pull out my records to see my current enrollment in Theology, as well as my applications for two grad schools of a religious nature! Him stretching my love for pokadots and spandex to such an extreme to changing my major, proves he is (once again) consumed with all things remotely relating to the word “gay”. An imaginative leap for a deranged mind: FICTION
Claim #4 Purchased a home in Compton
Considering I am living in Pasadena and will be for at least 2 years, one must wonder why he feels it is important to make up such a claim? It would have been more believable if he said I was “planning” on purchasing a home. At least this would have relieved him of his contradictory claim! An imaginative leap for a LOSER: FICTION
Claim #5 Gay men love malt liquor
Is it just me, or does anyone wonder how it is that HE knows this? Overhearing a conversation between the two of us will let any third party know of his more vast knowledge of liquor than me. The buck doesn’t stop there though. He also knows that “northern lights” is the street name for marijuana (as he confessed while watching the episode of The Office titled, “Drug Testing”). I will let the jury decide what his knowledge of this subject implies. An imaginative leap for a hypocrite: FICTION
Claim #6…………..
Now I am beginning to lose interest in defending claims that border on insanity and elementary school methodology. It is any scholar’s nightmare to have to deal with ludicrous propositions and infantile speculations set forth by the individual Tobias Lewsadder.
Thus I will end with two comments:
“Ivanka?” He clearly thought of “Ivan” (who was the “Great” prince of Russia in the 16th century), than simply added “ka”, which is an abbreviation of the German word meaning “cathode”. Can anyone not see the sad attempt to “create” a name?
“Tobias”: A Jewish hero that married his “KINSWOMAN” Sarah.
…”KINS”woman…
need I say more?
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Thursday, February 22, 2007
a Good day for a Good book
I sort of had a nostalgic experience while driving to school. I thought way back when I was in 4th grade. I remember it clearly. It was overcast and raining, just like it is today, and I sat down and read Mr. Murder the entire day. I spent a glorious 10 hours reading! I wish I was home right now, reading Mr. Murder again and enjoying the comforts of a blanket and hot cup of constant comet...
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
post post script: you got nothing on me Toby
Sunday, February 18, 2007
the curse
If anyone can tell me how I can treat Toby with kindness rather than pure abhorrence, let me know.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Post-Valentine commentary
And Rebecca, my dearest Valentine, everyday is beautiful when I look into your eyes...
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Biblical Greek
It will just be so awesome to read the Bible (New Testament, more specifically) in the original language it was written in! Well, on to Greek!!
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
1 MONTH!
Monday, January 22, 2007
Evangelical Theological Society
My 330 class is "The Problem of Evil". I'm sure I will find that class helpful, as well as highly enlightening. We live in a fallen world and we can't help but try and find answers to the tough questions that evil brings us.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Thursday, January 18, 2007
DWIGHT'S BACK!
okay I'm done.
Onto other things now. I'm excited to see my brother and Ryan this weekend. It will be good to hang out with them. Some Simon Museum is the plan, but I'm honestly looking more forward to The Hat (although Philipe's would be satisfactory as well). The funny thing is, I don't have anything planned beyond the Museum that Ryan's girlfriend suggested. So maybe we will all hang out and chat...or perhaps find another fun activity.
post script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Monday, January 15, 2007
"authority"
The answer baffles me just as much as it disturbs me. Us humans have a way about us when it comes to things supernatural and divine, don't we? No matter our walk of life, we come to the same point of the "other world". The side not quite seen, yet everywhere. Ninety-five percent of the world admit to a god, gods, God, or a metaphyical existence/entity. Even the atheist must realize his absolute abhorrence of all things religious is a mere reaction to the evil and hardships of life; a mind who made academics his/her god for the sake of explaining that which haunts us all. Evil.
And there it is, evil. Once again we are confronted with a substance we can't claim to be physical. Jeffrey Dahmer was arrested in his basement with random body parts stored in freezers, hearts half eaten on a table, and a trail of terrorized, broken family in his wake. Ed Gein was arrested after killing female victims and wearing their skins so he could feel like a woman. Edmund Kemper killed 8 different women so he could have the nerve to kill his mother whom he hated; her corpse he raped and later chopped up and shoved down the garbage disposal. Three men of hundreds whose stories are far worse than those previously mentioned are recorded among the serial killer files. The blatant stench of such wickedness cannot make its way across our conscious without us recognizing something...beyond the physical world. We really aren't alone, are we.....
Yet there is the counterpart that beckons recognition; beauty, nature, life, laughter, memories, children, marriage, sex, love, peace. Although these elements are here among us, mostly tangible at times, they do carry a deep sense of something divine. Here I am talking about the broad spectrum of all things good and bad and I can't help but speculate on the spirituality of it all. It is inescapable. Truth tends to have that effect, but not the "truth" the world spins by. Not truth as in the correct answer for a history test, or the specifics of a life-time warranty, or how many hydrogens are in water. I speak of the most important one, "Truth". The "Why" of all which matters most in this dying world.
"Why do you think that, my friend?"
"Well" he continued, "bad people can't get into heaven. Good people deserve too."
I challenged him by asking him where he got such ideas. I mean, where does one come up with qualifications of how to get into heaven? Or even the notion that a heaven exists? I wondered on what "authority" he derived this knowledge. Where do people decide this? And why should people believe it? If they believe in an eternal soul, should they risk their eternal state under the qualifications made up by society? or by something that "seems" good? When it comes to the important things in life I feel like the authority by which I answer the great questions of all time must be worth resting my faith upon.
How could my friend go through life by handling so carelessly all things divine and eternal, all the while answering questions of their nature as if he actually knows?
Thursday, January 11, 2007
The OFFICE!
1) The obvious one; extremely funny
2) The characters are so real. With the documentary format for filming (not to mention exceptional acting to bring in the real-life characters), I feel like I'm watching a true story unfolding.
3) As a result of point 2, I honestly care for the characters.
4) Every season gets much better than the previous!
In conclusion....Josh....brother....amigo......START WATCHING THE SHOW! (but don't forget to watch the previous two seasons first :P )
posts script: I LOVE MY WIFE!!!
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
Toby Smells!
Thursday, January 04, 2007
Nesting
My wedding was simply fantastic. I almost wished I had more time at the reception so I could properly thank everyone for coming and for the gifts. Rebecca and I couldn't be happier for the thousands of blessings we have experienced these past few weeks.
In about 10 minutes we are going to take off to Celestino and use our gift certificate for a fine Italian dinner.
WE LOVE YOU GUYS!!!!!
