I noticed that many people did not like the second Matrix movie. I don't understand this at all. What was not to like about the movie? There was plenty of action and you got to interact with a lot of new aspects of the matrix (the idea of certain programs not performing what they are meant to do; resulting in things such as werewolves and ghosts).
The two most annoying reasons that people thought it was terrible were: "I didn't understand it" and "Not a good storyline".
First of all, a persons inability to understand the depthness of a movie does not mean the movie is crap. Either you watch the movie again to give it a fair chance, or admit that it is way out of your league and walk away.
As for "not a good storyline"..............what? What about the story line, in any way, was cheap or not in depth? How was the first movie's story line more superior then the second? It seems to me that because the first movie brought up totally new ideas, and as such captivated audiences by the originality and special effects, that they then incorporated that as an AMAZING storyline. Just because you are now use to bullet time and the idea of people living in a dream world, doesn't negate the storyline one bit. The Matrix hit you with a mind boggling idea that we live in machines. That was new. Reloaded came out and continued the story line and then hit you with tons more philosophy and the realization that Zion had been created and destroyed several times before Neo. That was new...and mind bloggling as well.
Once again, whats wrong with the storyline?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
the first matrix just seemed to be less flashy with a better story. with all the flashing lights in the secind and third movies i thought i was going to have a seizure. i totally love the whole idea behind the whole story of all three.
i saw oceans 12 last night. are you a fan of oceans 11?
I love "Oceans 11". I'm hoping to see the second movie within the next week.
Post a Comment